We strongly recommend that authors ask a colleague with different expertise to review the manuscript before submission, in order to identify concepts and terminology that may present difficulties to non-specialist readers. Press, Oxford, 2004). What is an editorial process? Commercial suppliers of reagents or instrumentation should be identified only when the source is critical to the outcome of the experiments. But in June 2022, the journal was removed from SCI indexing, what can i do, so much of work in it with two revsions taking more than a year,what can be done, Why is a PhD essential to become a peer-reviewer. Subscribe and get curated content that will give impetus to your research paper. Book titles should be given in italics and all words in the title should have initial capitals. In order to further promote the practice of preprinting, Nature Communications launched an initiative in 2017 that allowed authors to list the preprints of papers hosted on any platform, and undergoing peer review at our journal, on our Under Consideration web page. It means reviewers have been invited, but you can't read anything more than that. We continue to encourage preprint deposition on any community-recognised preprint serverit is solely the authors choice to decide if and where they are going to post their results before the conclusion of the peer review process. Please see our brief guide to manuscript submission in PDF format for an overview of key information on submitting primary research for publication in Nature Communications. Is it a normal process if all results by the "Track Change" function in MS-Word of my revised manuscript, are visible after being built in Elsevier? is still under consideration Detailed Question - 23 days ago, I transferred my manuscript from Nature Physics to Nature Communications and an editor was assigned soon. and what would happen then? Nature Communications . Based on Nature's website it looks like the editor sends a letter regardless of the decision so your editor is probably just writing the decision and it could be anything from accept without revision (hopefully) all the way to reject without reconsideration. Owing to the volume of manuscripts we receive, all submissions need to be made via ouronline submission system. Nature will continue to publish the most significant advances in science and the Nature research journals will publish landmark papers of interest to their specific communities. This information will be included in the acceptance letter. Instead, we prefer to make decisions with all relevant material at hand, and therefore encourage you to submit your full manuscript to us. When the preprint is posted, a HTML version of the manuscript will be created and displayed when original figures are available, making it more machine-readableand hence easier to be discovered by search enginesthan a PDF. Internet Explorer). (in principle) (accept) (online)NC (Open Access Licence) (Article-processing charge)NC (Proof)Online6 (19:00 Japanese time), *** (20209-20212)140, 2020921Nature Structural & Molecular BiologyManuscript Transferred, 1016109110162, 1020, 1112 (point-by-point response to reviewers' comments), 1211NC (editorial requests), 113NC (proof), *** (20215-20222)250, 2021527Nature Chemical BiologyManuscript Transferred, 76 (Reviewer65), 1031 (point-by-point response to reviewers' comments), 11223 (653), 1213NC (editorial requests), 2022216~ (Editors' Highlights), Nature Communications, (Naturetransfer)NCzipZip of files for Reviewer2-4, Nature Communications, (Peer Review File)NCTransparent peer reviewPeer Review File, reviewer. For Commentaries or News & Views, titles of cited articles are not included. For general editorial enquiries, including manuscript submission queries, please contact naturecommunications@nature.com. Nature Communicationsdoes not charge submission fees or page charges. Why do academics stay as adjuncts for years rather than move around? Follow this link for information about the different types of contributions, along with their length and figure limits. Authors should, therefore, give careful thought to how their findings may be communicated clearly. Submission to Nature Communications is taken to imply that there is no significant overlap between the submitted manuscript and any other papers from the same authors under consideration. In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles All Reviewers Assigned : Nature Communications revised manuscript: What does it means. Blot and gel images should be pasted in and labelled with the relevant panel and identifying information such as the antibody used. After being under the status 'All reviewers assigned', the manuscript status changed back to 'Manuscript Under consideration'. When a manuscript is accepted for publication, we will ask for high-resolution figure files, possibly in a different electronic format. Please use the Nature Research Chemical Structures Guide and ChemDraw template to ensure that you prepare your figures in a format that will require minimal changes by our art and production teams. Use of an LLM should be properly documented in the Methods section (and if a Methods section is not available, in a suitable alternative part) of the manuscript. Modulation-doped growth of mosaic graphene with single-crystalline p-n junctions for efficient photocurrent generation. For specific details, see Formatting an Initial Submission. 2017-07-13. The manuscript was under review when it was showing 'all reviewers assigned' and when the status changed to 'under consideration' it means that reviews are back with her and she is discussing it with her collegues. Stack Exchange network consists of 181 Q&A communities including Stack Overflow, the largest, most trusted online community for developers to learn, share their knowledge, and build their careers. The systematic name of the compound and its bold Arabic numeral are used as the heading for the experimental protocol. Equations and mathematical expressions should be provided in the main text of the paper. Alternatively, authors may choose to request a fresh review, in which case they should not use the automated transfer link, and the editors will evaluate the paper without reference to the previous review process. I wonder if this is a usual case. Authors will see a proof of figures. These texts have on the whole been rather faithfully transmitted in the Greek manuscript tradition. The manuscript was under review when it was showing 'all reviewers assigned' and when the status changed to 'under consideration' it means that reviews are back with her and she is discussing it with her collegues.